Are you minding the gap between peer review and publishing at your journal? Here are 3 common causes of gaps in process and how to avoid them.
Three ways that academic journals can better acknowledge and support the vast network of ESL authors to help them navigate manuscript preparation and to encourage more global research policy and dissemination.
In this post, we look at 3 areas of manuscript submissions and peer review that can test authors' trust in your journal and how to address them.
Despite the benefits of embracing modern innovations, some industries have been slow to adopt them - academic publishing being a prime example. In the post below, we break out 3 vestiges of print publishing that journals are holding onto online and why it's holding them back.
There are certain considerations OA journal teams should keep in mind when choosing which peer review and publishing tools and systems to use. In this post, we outline 3 things to consider.
Are you struggling to determine which promotion outlets to focus on for your academic journal? There's no better way to make informed promotion decisions than basing them off of publication data.
Whether you have designated production editors at your journal or one core group of editors sharing the peer review and production work, you'll need to take certain steps to avoid bottlenecks between peer review and production.
New public resource page provides an overview of the academic-led publishing movement and resources for scholars and institutions looking to support or launch academic-led titles.
This post examines why academic-led journal publishing is key to lowering the rising cost of research and the technology that's defining the academic-led publishing movement, including a detailed case study.
When it comes to effective editorial team operations, Jennifer Mahar, executive peer review manager at Origin Editorial, says there are certain hallmarks that set apart the best teams from the rest.