Tag:scholarly communication

On February 7, 2019 we're taking part in Academic-Led Publishing Day, an inaugural event to celebrate and facilitate academic-led publishing initiatives. Learn more about the event and how you can get involved!

Now journals using Scholastica Open Access Publishing can have their articles automatically deposited into the Portico digital preservation service - get the details!

Every journal's peer review process can use some polishing from time to time. In this blog post we outline three areas of peer review that all journals should audit and how to approach data collection.

Throughout OA Week October 22-28 Scholastica will be hosting a free-flowing Twitter discussion about the relationship between academic-led publishing and equitable open access using the hashtag #AcademicLedOA

Matthias Weber, assistant professor at the School of Finance at the University of St. Gallen, discusses why he believes the convention of alphabetical author lists should be abandoned.

In this post, we look at some of the most common areas where editorial teams get caught up in manual work and how you can use organization and automation to avoid them.

In this post we outline some best practices for creating a peer review feedback form and what yours should cover.

If you want your journal to reach the broadest possible readership, it's imperative for you to prioritize search engine optimization or SEO. In this post, we overview 4 often overlooked areas of SEO that all journals should focus on and why.

As part of Peer Review Week, we at Scholastica decided to highlight some of the many ways that academic journals can take steps to cultivate more diversity in peer review and consequently publish articles that reflect more varied perspectives.

In this interview, head of metadata at Crossref Patricia Feeney discusses metadata best practices and how journals can use Participation Reports to tell if they are sending Crossref rich machine-readable metadata.