There are some law reviews who allow authors to submit optional demographic information when submitting articles. Here's how optional demographic information works on Scholastica.

Scholastica has launched an all-new law review submission process to help legal scholars identify which law reviews are best-suited for their article.

Our friends Bertrand Russell, Ludwig Wittgenstein, Simone de Beauvoir, and Maurice and Merleau-Ponty had success using Scholastica recently and wanted their story told.

Scholastica is proud to work with numerous law journals. Here are some ways we think Scholastica can help make the legal publishing process better.

A Library Sciences Masters student, recently sent us a Slideshare presentation titled, 'What's Wrong With Scholarly Publishing Today?'by Bjorn Brembs . It provided a ton of illuminating data on problems that scientists see with academic publishing.

No one is paying us to create Scholastica. We're making it because we think that there are huge problems with the academic publishing industry. And of course, we've taken it upon ourselves to provide solutions to the problems we've found.

I decided to get a little 'academic-y' and do some research on the peer review process because when I thought about my own experience, it went something like this...

The UK House of Commons Science and Technology Committee today released a report on 'Peer Review in Scientific Publications.' They find much room for improvement, especially suggesting a need for greater transparency