There are certain considerations OA journal teams should keep in mind when choosing which peer review and publishing tools and systems to use. In this post, we outline 3 things to consider.
Are you struggling to determine which promotion outlets to focus on for your academic journal? There's no better way to make informed promotion decisions than basing them off of publication data.
Whether you have designated production editors at your journal or one core group of editors sharing the peer review and production work, you'll need to take certain steps to avoid bottlenecks between peer review and production.
When it comes to effective editorial team operations, Jennifer Mahar, executive peer review manager at Origin Editorial, says there are certain hallmarks that set apart the best teams from the rest.
Scholastica announces the release of the second handbook in the Scholarly Journal Promotion 101 Series - Content Resurfacing 101 for Scholarly Journals.
A group of law review editors share how they're juggling law review and summer associate work and tips for fellow editors. Above all, be proactive and don't let things pile up.
What steps can editors take to attract high-quality submissions needed to grow the reputation and impact of their journal? Panel-style webinar explores the many angles of this question.
What steps can editors take to develop their journal's reputation and impact in order to attract a wider audience? Free webinar offers insights.
The most popular goals of the law review editors at the 2015 National Conference of Law Reviews, from going paperless to organizing a symposium.
Editors share what they are doing to not only refine the quality of their journal's peer review process but also speed up their workflow.