Is your law review updating authors about where you are in your article selection cycle? If not, it's time to start! Here are the main article selection updates you should be communicating.

In this blog post, we round up some top tips and resources in the areas of law review that are most critical to editors and authors, to help foster a shared understanding of article selection and a more successful law review submission season all around.

If you ask any legal scholar for one area of article selection that they think all law reviews could improve, there's a good chance that it will involve communication in some way. Here are three things authors want law reviews to communicate better based on the findings of a Scholastica survey.

How do legal scholars feel about law reviews' article selection processes? We reached out to authors submitting to law reviews using Scholastica to find out.

In his article, Being Latino in the 21st Century: Reexamining Politicized Identity and the Problem of Representation, Marvin Astrada, Professor of Politics and History at NYU, explores the effects of politicization of the Latino identity during and beyond the 2016 presidential election.

Should you close submissions at your law review while you are not actively reviewing or should you keep them open? In this blog post we consider the pros and cons of both options and the importance of always making clear to authors whether or not your law review is open.

Ashley Heidemann, Founder of JD Advising, LLC, shares some legal writing do's and don'ts that everyone needs to be reminded of sometimes.

Have you considered why you should be sending decisions for all articles? Here are 5 reasons your law review should prioritize sending rejection emails.

Law review editors share how Scholastica is helping their journal more easily manage all aspects of the article selection process.