If you ask any legal scholar for one area of article selection that they think all law reviews could improve, there's a good chance that it will involve communication in some way. Here are three things authors want law reviews to communicate better based on the findings of a Scholastica survey.
How do legal scholars feel about law reviews' article selection processes? We reached out to authors submitting to law reviews using Scholastica to find out.
We've created a new Scholastica Twitter account for all things law review—scholasticaLR. Follow the new account and get the latest law review opening and submission season resource updates!
In this post, we're sharing some submissions pro-tips that you can use to improve your chances of publication and save precious time.
The third in a series of data-driven law review posts - this post focuses on when decisions are made by law reviews.
The second in a series of data-driven law review posts, this post provides insight into expedited decision requests.
The first in a series of data-driven law review posts, this post provides insight into when law reviews receive submissions.
Thanks to all who participated in the #LawRevHaiku Twitter contest! Here's a recap of the top three winners and other tweets that were entered.
Inga Ivsan, assistant public defender for the 17th Judicial Circuit in Broward County Florida, discusses her research on gaps in constitutional law and her experience getting published while in law school.
Law review submission season is coming fast, and with it so are countless journal opening announcements and submissions updates to follow!