Have you ever wondered what nuggets of wisdom outgoing law review editors would offer their successors and submitting authors given the opportunity? At Scholastica, we certainly have! So we've started reaching out to seasoned e-boards to ask them to share their top submission season dos and don'ts.

At Scholastica, we know law review editors and submitting authors are always looking to learn about the latest submission season dos and don'ts. So we decided to reach out to outgoing e-boards to ask them to share guidance around navigating the different stages of submissions.

What makes for a great law review submission experience? Scholastica is inviting legal scholars to share submission success stories highlighting law reviews they've worked with that had superior article selection processes and the best practices they followed.

In this free webinar on demand, we cover top article selection and online publishing best practices. If you're new to law review, tune in to learn how to make the most of your e-board tenure!

If you ask any legal scholar for one area of article selection that they think all law reviews could improve, there's a good chance that it will involve communication in some way. Here are three things authors want law reviews to communicate better based on the findings of a Scholastica survey.

How do legal scholars feel about law reviews' article selection processes? We reached out to authors submitting to law reviews using Scholastica to find out.

We've created a new Scholastica Twitter account for all things law review—scholasticaLR. Follow the new account and get the latest law review opening and submission season resource updates!

The third in a series of data-driven law review posts - this post focuses on when decisions are made by law reviews.

The second in a series of data-driven law review posts, this post provides insight into expedited decision requests.

The first in a series of data-driven law review posts, this post provides insight into when law reviews receive submissions.