We've added a new technical checklist feature to the Scholastica Peer Review System to help journals standardize their workflows and ensure all editors can quickly determine the status of submissions as they go through the technical check phase. Read on to learn more!

What technical checks (a.k.a. quality checks) should your editorial team be completing? When should technical checks be done? And how can you optimize the process for speed and efficiency? We break down what you need to know in this blog post.

How can you tell if it's time for your team to move to a new editorial management system (a.k.a. peer review software)? This blog post covers the key indicators to look for whether you're considering trying software for the first time or migrating from one system to another.

We're continuing our #AskScholastica blog series with a question we frequently hear from journal publishers and editors — Should we import past and pending manuscripts from our old peer review system into our new one? Here's the scoop.

In recent years, the idea of implementing Agile project management methodologies to work more efficiently has been becoming more popular in academic publishing. But what does Agile mean exactly? In this post, we overview what Agile is and how it can be applied to editorial planning, including a link to an on-demand ISMTE conference session with Agile journal management examples.

During this free on-demand webinar, speakers from Scholastica and J&J Editorial cover best practices for conducting a peer review audit to improve journal efficiency from a technical and editorial perspective.