Here's the top news in academia this month in open access, academic publishing, higher education, and more.
Scholastica has launched an all-new law review submission process to help legal scholars identify which law reviews are best-suited for their article.
Scholastica co-founder Rob Walsh featured in an interview on the ProfHacker blog at the Chronicle of Higher Education.
A look at the 3 main quantitative measures used to determine the current state of open access to research and implications for the future of open access over the next 10 years.
Team Scholastica is pleased to announce that we're ready to allow academic journals to log in and use the system!
In yesterday's New York Times, D.D. Gutenplan writes how librarians have taken up the fight against academic publishers who they see as making huge profits while adding little value to the dissemination of academic knowledge.
A Library Sciences Masters student, recently sent us a Slideshare presentation titled, 'What's Wrong With Scholarly Publishing Today?'by Bjorn Brembs . It provided a ton of illuminating data on problems that scientists see with academic publishing.
A new homepage design as we get close to launching our private beta.
I decided to get a little 'academic-y' and do some research on the peer review process because when I thought about my own experience, it went something like this...
Has the academic publishing ecosystem reached its melting point?