Have you ever wondered what nuggets of wisdom outgoing law review editors would offer their successors and submitting authors given the opportunity? At Scholastica, we certainly have! So we've started reaching out to seasoned e-boards to ask them to share their top submission season dos and don'ts.

More law reviews than ever have begun introducing exclusive submission track options for authors, but the concept is still relatively new to legal scholarship. Are you wondering what exclusive submissions means exactly and how the article selection process differs for exclusive papers? This blog walks through what you need to know.

At Scholastica, we know law review editors and submitting authors are always looking to learn about the latest submission season dos and don'ts. So we decided to reach out to outgoing e-boards to ask them to share guidance around navigating the different stages of submissions.

It's that time again — law review submission season is kicking into high gear! As authors prepare their latest submissions and editors work towards final article selections, we wanted to provide a few resources to help along the way.

What makes for a great law review submission experience? Scholastica is inviting legal scholars to share submission success stories highlighting law reviews they've worked with that had superior article selection processes and the best practices they followed.

The best way to help new law review editors get on track fast is to make a training plan. In this blog post, we share steps you can take to start preparing for your law review's next board transition. It will come up faster than you think!

If you ask any legal scholar for one area of article selection that they think all law reviews could improve, there's a good chance that it will involve communication in some way. Here are three things authors want law reviews to communicate better based on the findings of a Scholastica survey.

How do legal scholars feel about law reviews' article selection processes? We reached out to authors submitting to law reviews using Scholastica to find out.

Houston Law Review's editor in chief shares how they are using Scholastica publishing tools and services to make their content more discoverable online and empower readers to explore the law review from all digital devices.

The editor in chief of Capital University Law Review, Avery Moore, discusses their transition to publishing online via Scholastica and how they plan to keep building out the law review's digital presence.