The best way to help new law review editors get on track fast is to make a training plan. In this blog post, we share steps you can take to start preparing for your law review's next board transition. It will come up faster than you think!

If you ask any legal scholar for one area of article selection that they think all law reviews could improve, there's a good chance that it will involve communication in some way. Here are three things authors want law reviews to communicate better based on the findings of a Scholastica survey.

How do legal scholars feel about law reviews' article selection processes? We reached out to authors submitting to law reviews using Scholastica to find out.

Houston Law Review's editor in chief shares how they are using Scholastica publishing tools and services to make their content more discoverable online and empower readers to explore the law review from all digital devices.

The editor in chief of Capital University Law Review, Avery Moore, discusses their transition to publishing online via Scholastica and how they plan to keep building out the law review's digital presence.

After charging the same amount for law review submissions since 2011, we've found it necessary to modestly increase the price to account for improvements we're making to Scholastica.

Now through September 25, 2016 Scholastica is running a Twitter contest for the best law review haiku. Tweet a relevant haiku with the hashtag #LawRevHaiku for the chance to win.

Some great updates to Scholastica's article submission form just in time for law review submission season.

Scholastica has a bunch of great resources to help you navigate the ins and outs of submitting to law reviews.

Law review editors share how Scholastica is helping their journal more easily manage all aspects of the article selection process.