In this post, we look at 3 areas of manuscript submissions and peer review that can test authors' trust in your journal and how to address them.
Despite the benefits of embracing modern innovations, some industries have been slow to adopt them - academic publishing being a prime example. In the post below, we break out 3 vestiges of print publishing that journals are holding onto online and why it's holding them back.
There are certain considerations OA journal teams should keep in mind when choosing which peer review and publishing tools and systems to use. In this post, we outline 3 things to consider.
New public resource page provides an overview of the academic-led publishing movement and resources for scholars and institutions looking to support or launch academic-led titles.
This post examines why academic-led journal publishing is key to lowering the rising cost of research and the technology that's defining the academic-led publishing movement, including a detailed case study.
When it comes to effective editorial team operations, Jennifer Mahar, executive peer review manager at Origin Editorial, says there are certain hallmarks that set apart the best teams from the rest.
The new 2nd edition of the Definitive Guide to Digital Journal Publishing covers everything you need to know to develop more digitally-driven publishing practices and improve your journal's online presence.
What can editors do to avoid sending review assignments and hearing crickets? It can be difficult to predict whether a reviewer might become unresponsive. However, there are ways for editors to try to avoid such situations.
The start of a new year is always a good time for reflection. As we head into the new year, we wanted to take a look back and share some blog highlights from 2017.
Since December 2016, Editage Insights has been running a survey of scholars to gauge their opinions on academic journal publishing. In this interview, Clarinda Cerejo, editor-in-chief, shares preliminary findings from the first 5,000 responses.