Tag:scholarly publishing

New features to help you tailor your journal's peer review and publishing process, including: reviewer tags, Digital Object Identifier metadata, and custom journal subdomains.

Check out the peer review systems these three journals decided on and the benefits of each.

How can scholars receive recognition for their review contributions at different journals regardless of the openness of the review? ORCID, CASRAI & F1000 Working Group propose a plan.

How journal editors and publishers are tracking alternative metrics data and pinpointing the metrics that matter most to them in order to improve their publications.

If you want to speed up peer review at your journal, reassessing your team's current process is the place to start.

As the scope of digital humanities initiatives continues to evolve and grow, scholars and librarians are surfacing innovative possibilities for the field.

Authors of Making Institutional Repositories Work delve into the history of IRs and the experiences of libraries currently in varying stages of IR development.

We've rolled out some great features including: bulk manuscript tagging, the ability for editors to upload files to decision letters, and more.

The PubPro unconference brings together editors working in a wide-range of publications to discuss the way they manage their publications and approach editing and production.

Anita Harris managing editor of SubStance: A Review of Theory and Literary Criticism shares tips to write constructive rejections that authors may actually appreciate